PR-24 Baton vs. Straight Baton: Which Is Right for Your Security Team?

Choosing the right impact weapon for your security team isn't just about personal preference, it's a strategic decision that affects officer safety, liability exposure, and operational effectiveness. The two most common options, the PR-24 side-handle baton and the straight baton, each offer distinct advantages and challenges. Understanding these differences will help you make an informed choice that aligns with your team's mission, training capabilities, and legal environment.

In this article, we'll break down the key differences between PR-24 and straight batons, examine their tactical applications, and help you determine which tool best serves your security operation.

Understanding the PR-24 Side-Handle Baton

The PR-24, developed by Monadnock in the 1970s, features a perpendicular side handle positioned about six inches from one end. This design transformed the traditional baton into a versatile tool offering multiple grip configurations and control techniques.

Key advantages of the PR-24:

• Superior subject control through leverage-based holds and escorts

• Enhanced blocking capability for defensive applications

• Multiple striking surfaces from various grip positions

• Effective retention features when properly deployed

• Psychological deterrent effect due to distinctive appearance

However, the PR-24 requires substantial training investment. Officers must master multiple grip changes, understand biomechanical leverage principles, and develop muscle memory through consistent practice. Without ongoing training, the side handle can actually become a liability, creating confusion during high-stress encounters or providing an additional grip point for suspects attempting weapon retention.

The Case for Straight Batons

Straight batons, whether fixed-length or expandable, offer simplicity and intuitive use. These tools have served law enforcement and security professionals for generations, and their straightforward design translates to faster skill acquisition.

Primary benefits of straight batons:

• Intuitive deployment requiring less specialized training

• Faster skill development for new officers

• Simpler weapon retention (no protruding handle)

• Lower training maintenance requirements

• Wide availability and lower replacement costs

Straight batons excel in environments where training time is limited or officer turnover is high. They're particularly well-suited for security operations that need a reliable impact weapon without the training overhead associated with more complex systems. The expandable variants offer additional benefits in terms of concealment and carry comfort during routine patrols.

Training Investment and Skill Retention

The training gap between these two tools is significant and directly impacts your operational decisions. PR-24 proficiency typically requires 16-24 hours of initial training, followed by quarterly refreshers to maintain competency. Officers must practice transitions between grip positions, blocking sequences, and escort techniques regularly.

Straight baton training typically achieves basic competency in 8-12 hours, with simpler refresher requirements. The reduced complexity means officers retain skills longer between training cycles, a critical consideration for organizations with budget constraints or seasonal staffing patterns.

Questions to assess your training capacity:

• What is your annual training budget per officer?

• How frequently does your team receive defensive tactics refreshers?

• What is your average officer tenure and turnover rate?

• Do you have certified instructors on staff or rely on external trainers?

• Can you commit to quarterly skills maintenance for complex weapons systems?

Tactical Applications and Use-of-Force Considerations

Your operational environment should heavily influence your baton selection. PR-24 batons shine in scenarios requiring subject control and escort: hospitals, courthouses, detention facilities, and corporate campuses where hands-on control techniques are common. The side handle enables wrist locks, arm bars, and compliance holds that straight batons cannot replicate.

Straight batons are often preferable for patrol-oriented security roles where officers work independently, cover large areas, or face primarily distance-threat scenarios. Their simplicity reduces decision-making complexity during critical incidents when cognitive resources are already taxed.

Both tools occupy the same general position on the use-of-force continuum, intermediate force options between empty-hand techniques and lethal force. However, documentation and justification standards remain identical regardless of which tool you select. Your policy framework, documentation protocols, and legal guidance should drive deployment decisions, not the tool itself.

Common Implementation Mistakes

Many security organizations select batons based on factors that ultimately undermine effectiveness:

• Appearance over function: Choosing PR-24s because they "look more professional" without committing to proper training

• Inconsistent equipment: Allowing officers to carry personal-preference batons without standardized training

• Training gaps: Initial certification without ongoing skills maintenance

• Policy misalignment: Implementing weapons that exceed your actual use-of-force policy permissions

• Inadequate instructor credentials: Relying on officers with minimal training to teach others

Making Your Decision

The right baton for your team depends on honest assessment of your operational needs, training capabilities, and risk tolerance. PR-24 batons offer superior control options but demand serious training investment. Straight batons provide reliable functionality with lower training overhead.

Consider starting with straight batons if you're building a new program, face high turnover, or have limited training resources. Organizations with established training programs, low turnover, and missions requiring frequent subject control may benefit from PR-24 implementation, provided you commit to proper initial and ongoing training.

Regardless of which tool you choose, remember that the baton itself is only as effective as the officer wielding it. Consistent, reality-based training delivered by qualified instructors is the foundation of any successful impact weapon program.

Get Professional Guidance for Your Team

Selecting and implementing the right defensive tools requires expert guidance tailored to your specific operational environment. Incendiary Training Services provides comprehensive baton training for both PR-24 and straight baton systems, delivered on-site at your facility or at our dedicated training locations.

Our certified instructors bring real-world experience from law enforcement and security operations, ensuring your team receives practical, legally defensible training that translates directly to field performance. We'll help you assess your needs, select appropriate tools, and build a sustainable training program that keeps your officers safe and your organization protected.

Contact Incendiary Training Services today to schedule a consultation and discover which baton system and training approach is right for your security team.

---

Published by Incendiary Training Services

www.TrainWithITS.com